The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Intellectual functioning per the overlap. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 03:48, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Intellectual function (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources even for such a vague concept. Fails GNG. RexxS (talk) 18:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment There is clearly a lot of overlap between the definitions of "intellectual function[ing]", "general mental ability", "cognition", and "intellect", among other terms. I was able to find this which defines the term "intellectual functioning" (maybe a better title for this page than the current one). IntoThinAir (talk) 18:34, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 23:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to intellectual functioning. MarkZusab (talk) 21:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to intellectual functioning. If there is a gap in Wikipedia's content (as suggested in the 'article', the target page would be the place to address it. Nick Moyes (talk) 16:00, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.