The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted per G4. There were other sources added but they didn't stack up, and the article hasn't changed in essence from the original. Realised the previous discussion never actually finished; still qualifies as G11 as is hasn't changed since last time. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 20:17, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

International Referral[edit]

International Referral (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No purpose except for advertising the existence of thecompany. No proof of notability, no reliable sources. DGG ( talk ) 20:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:07, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - recreated 2 days after the article was deleted in a prior AfD. Lukeno94 (talk) 19:53, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.