The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invionics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources presented that are independent of the company, just press releases and the company's website. I was unable to find anything online that indicates the company meets our notability guideline at WP:NCORP. Obvious WP:COI issues here as well. VQuakr (talk) 04:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:A WP:SPA article on a company, describing their initial proposition but without evidence of attained notability. Searches find occasional announcements, such as this June 2017 acquisition but nothing to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 13:08, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:44, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. unimportant company, insubstantial references. DGG ( talk ) 01:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.