The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ip Tai Tak[edit]

Ip Tai Tak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claims of notability and no independent sources. It doesn't matter who his teacher was since notability is not inherited and the only two sources are by one of his students. There's also nothing to indicate he meets any of the notability criteria for martial artists.Jakejr (talk) 22:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 23:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Doesn't meet WP:GNG since there are no independent sources and there's no evidence he meets anything in WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 04:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per above.ch (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.