The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Isam Khalil

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a boxer who lacks significant coverage and fails to meet the notability criteria at WP:NSPORTS. Jakejr (talk) 07:26, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Jakejr (talk) 07:26, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - He does have a profile on BoxRec, but interestingly enough, he has no ranking in his division either in-country or world, as many of his opponents do for example. Other independent sources are more or less nonexistent. Therefore, given the supposed length of his career (11 years), the relatively few fights in that time, and his lack of a ranking, it would seem to indicate that he was not and never has been a professional boxer and does not meet NSPORTS. MSJapan (talk) 19:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article lacks good sources and the subject doesn't meet WP:NSPORTS or WP:GNG. Astudent0 (talk) 19:01, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's no evidence he meets any notability criteria. He certainly fails WP:NSPORTS#Boxing. Papaursa (talk) 00:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.