- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 talk 06:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- J. Everett Prewitt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I came upon this article while browsing through page creations by a sock farm uncovered in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Heathnw77. There's a little coverage, but I don't think it's enough to establish notability. The majority of sources seem to be press releases and blogs. The Wikipedia article cites a reporter's column at Cleveland.com that muses on his own career prospects, which does not seem like a good source to establish notability for his friend. The awards do not look significant, and a single review from Kirkus Reviews is not enough. It looks too soon for an article yet, and this is likely a vanity page created by a paid editor. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:35, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:36, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:36, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:36, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. , 'by one of our basic principles: WP is an encyclopedia . He has a full entry in Contemporary Authors (also known as Gale Contemporary authors, and available online free through most medium and large public libraries as Literary Resource Center.[1] This is the standard reference work for recent American literature (and some other literatures also ); as the standard encyclopedicwork in the field, everyone with a full entry in it is automatically suitable for inclusion in WP. (The easiest way of determining this is to search in Worldcat--if there's a Contemporary Authors listing it will appear as one of the entries for the name. DGG ( talk ) 04:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.