The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:19, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

JSN PowerAdmin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Top 100 Joomia extensions is not notability ,and there's no evidence for anything else DGG ( talk ) 21:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: The referenced Joomla websites do not amount to WP:RS and there is a lack of evidence of notability for the product there or located elsewhere. AllyD (talk) 13:13, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Numerous searches and current references do not provide one significant third-party, I found a WikiHow guide but that's hardly significant. This software hasn't received the news coverage (even minimal) required for an encyclopedia article. SwisterTwister talk 18:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.