The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 18:33, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jacky Newcomb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-promotional BLP of an essentially non-notable person. Werty1234 (talk) 19:56, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• delete Self promotion. For independent sourcing, perhaps one of the angels might like to contribute something? Andy Dingley (talk) 00:16, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As nom says. Why do so many people think an angel is looking over them? She makes a living out of answering this question in tv interviews. Szzuk (talk) 18:00, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: non-notable, blatant self-endorsing promotionalism. Quis separabit? 00:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.