The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqueline Andrade[edit]

Jacqueline Andrade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Only able to find 1 other independent source about her which is a very brief statement from her: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-AgNAwAAQBAJ&pg=PR1&dq=Jacqueline+Andrade&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjqxsKG85XKAhVBaRQKHeNQAHoQ6AEIJTAB#v=onepage&q=Jacqueline%20Andrade&f=false There just isn't enough information to establish notability. ツStacey (talk) 19:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Professor Andrade is also known as Jackie and her research has been notable on a number of occasions under that name: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22jackie+andrade%22&oq=%22jackie+andrade%22&aqs=chrome..69i57.5375j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8#q=%22jackie+andrade%22&tbm=nws — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acad0214 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 2016 January 7 (UTC)

  Thank you for that - With that information I would like to withdraw my nomination for deletion please ツStacey (talk) 13:50, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.