The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 19:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jaeksoft WebSearch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Claims but fails WP:N in my opinion. Honestly, I'm not 100% sure about this nomination and hope I found the right channel to have it discussed. There are some issues, let me list them:

• Written like an advert by the sole author of the software
• Not-notable product from an equally not-notable company
• Sources questionable, the first is a list where authors can add their products, and the second one did receive criticism for COI.
• Orphan

Pgallert (talk) 10:53, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment My TW template timed out in the process. I believe I have now manually completed the process, can someone check, please? --Pgallert (talk) 11:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC) [reply]

• Delete per nomination. Not a notable piece of software. References given are to a listing, and to a website for a technology used in this software. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:11, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn advertising. Gigs (talk) 23:37, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.