The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. This should probably just have been deleted as an attack page (WP:CSD#G10) but with the attack removed it still fails WP:CSD#A7 (no assertion of notability). —David Eppstein (talk) 06:13, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Christy

[edit]

Contested PROD without any rationale given. The PROD nom was "In all likelihood made up, if not I can find no reference to this man." Might be a Speedy G2 or G3 case but in case of doubt, there's the AfD process. No reliable sources, probably a hoax. MLauba (talk) 14:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as G3 and A7. Blatant misinformation, does not claim or establish notability. KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

**Comment: no claims about this being a living person so A7 wouldn't qualify I believe :). MLauba (talk) 14:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Nevermind. MLauba (talk) 14:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment This the right fella? [1] Cheers. I'^mperator 14:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per my PROD.--Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 16:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.