The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SK1: nominator has withdrawn deletion rationale and no one else recommends deletion czar 03:04, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jiangda, Nagqu[edit]

Jiangda, Nagqu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has no sources and only consist of one sentence. The article does not meet Wikipedia:Notability as there is not a lot (if any) coverage of the village and I can't seem to find any information about the village beside what's in the article, all the article says is it's a village in Tibet.– BrandonXLF ^(t@lk) 03:35, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article has been expanded and now has sources, the article is notable and seems good enough to keep. – BrandonXLF ^(t@lk) 21:44, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I agree, it is not notable. Not mentioned anywhere else, besides weather websites. --@Boothsift 04:56, 29 November 2018 (UTC) *Keep I managed to find more sources now and the article looks way better now. --@Boothsift 01:37, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Have a look at the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive691#User:Dr._Blofeld on notability of villages in different parts of the world. I added in a summary of the weather to the article since that is sourced :) RonaldDuncan (talk) 11:23, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:31, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment villages are notable per per WP:GEOLAND: Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Before making up my mind, however, I would like to know the exact location of this village. Our coordinates point at an uninhabited ridge. There is a hamlet south of the marker but that may or may not be Jamda. gidonb (talk) 14:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jiangda seems to be the modern name, and has "xiang" on the end indicating that it is a town/township-level place, so probably notable.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment (@Gidonb, RonaldDuncan, and Dr. Blofeld:) When doing a search of "Jamda" I can see an Indian village and I can find the exact coordinates for that. Should we just convert this into an article about the village. The village also looks pretty big. Here's the coordinates 22°15′40″N 86°03′05″E / 22.26111°N 86.05139°E / 22.26111; 86.05139. – BrandonXLF ^(t@lk) 17:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I fleshed it out a bit, it's notable. Baidu Baike seems to be copying a government source, ideally it should be replaced if it can be found, I on;y found stuff on the history and villages on the government website.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:13, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep With the expansion, this appears to be notable enough. Applodion (talk) 20:53, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.