The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 06:41, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jamia Islamia Bhatkal[edit]

Jamia Islamia Bhatkal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable madrasa. Seems promotional and No WP:RS. Kutyava (talk) 01:23, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Kutyava (talk) 01:23, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as no RS can be found, notability in question.--WikiAviator (talk) 01:35, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:46, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep, notability is iffy, but I have found some sources [1], [2], [3]. Willing to vote the other way on this one, but I feel like the GNG requirements are just met. Utopes (talk) 00:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I'd love to discuss the sources that I provided on the 27th now that I've been away long enough to have a refreshed take. Utopes (talk) 04:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Seems like a institution that is organized and celebrated its 50th anniversary. Notice coverage in a reliable source like the Hindu. Lot of ccoverage on Bhatkallys.com which appears to be a polished portal covering local and regional news. Coverage on Daijiworld as well of an internationl event they ran. This is one of many articles. This was pointed out by Utopes too. Regional Karnataka always has challenges in getting coverage in what we consider mainstream newspapers. As an editor who also covers Karnataka topics, I often fall back on portals like Daijiworld to look for coverage on topics related to regional Karnataka. So in summary my take is Keep! Arunram (talk) 15:42, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: I'm in similar mind to @Arunram. صدیق صبري (talk) 09:54, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.