The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 15:20, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Janusz Majer

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable mountain-climber. There are some news stories mentioning him, but they don't seem to go into depth. Having a Polish speaker look over this would be helpful. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Based not just on his considerable mountaineering achievments, but also as an expedition leader, explorer, mountaineering businessman, and author of articles in mountaineering "journals of record" in the UK, USA and Japan. I express my opinion as an editor who has written 12 biographies of mountaineers, two of which were featured in Did you know? on the main page. He's notable. Cullen328 (talk) 19:01, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Discussed in numerous third-party sources (Google Books). I agree that a Polish speaker might offer additional insight, that being said in my opinion the subject is notable enough. DubiousIrony ^yell 03:05, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable mountaineer. Frustratingly, the problem with sources is a lot in Google Books only have snippet view which make it difficult to ascertain context. I've added one fully available source - and there are many sources quoted in the article. The problems with sourcing don't seem sufficient to warrant deletion. - ManicSpider (talk) 09:00, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.