The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Although the young man's death was a tragedy, the consensus of the debate has confirmed that this article ran afoul of WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:58, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jared High (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No provided third party sources support the notability of this individual. Local interest story only. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 14:43, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The story is a news event not an encyclopaedic subject. The court case was settled, which means no legal precedents and no ongoing significance that would make that an encyclopaedic subject. Also lacks any independent references and any coverage of the other side's viewpoint. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Local interest story of minimal encyclopedic significance. Resolute 14:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. I know of several similar cases where distraught parents either blame the schools and either brought lawsuits or tried to enact statutes that make the schools responsible, so not very unique. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:16, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per Resolute. Mrs. Wolpoff (talk) 19:29, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Matt Deres (talk) 00:39, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.