The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Javier de la Fuente

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Fails WP:PROF. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 04:45, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 20:06, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 20:07, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article describes him as an assistant professor who has written papers and won best-paper awards. Which means he's off to an appropriate start for an academic career, but WP:TOOSOON to be notable for that. His Google Scholar profile [1] shows only single-digit citations, so WP:PROF#C1 is out of reach for now, and he doesn't appear to pass any of the other WP:PROF criteria (in particular, the best paper awards are explicitly described in WP:PROF as not being at the level demanded by #C2). —David Eppstein (talk) 18:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:28, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.