The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 22:14, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jaya Supermarket[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of significance, notability is vague (or nil, as no references are included). If the article is about a well known landmark, it does not emphasize on the land mark rather than the subject itself. Delete, as a proposer. JAaron95 (Talk) 05:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Passes WP:GNG per ^[1], ^[2], ^[3], ^[4], ^[5], ^[6]. Also, I feel that an assertion of importance is existent in the article, as the market/mall being one of the first supermarkets in Petaling Jaya. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:06, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Landmark neighbourhood mall in Petaling Jaya to reopen its doors". The Star.
^ "Nostalgic new mall launched". The Star.
^ "Malls start refocusing on suburbs". The Star.
^ "Jaya Supermart Collapse: 'Something not done right'". The Star.
^ "Jaya Supermarket demolition done without approval". The Star.
^ "Firms charged over lack of safety in supermarket collapse". The Star.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:30, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.