The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jaz Banga[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This entrepreneur seems to have kept himself busy, but doesn't satisfy WP:BIO and WP:GNG as far as I can see. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:25, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 07:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 07:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 07:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now at least as WP:TNT as I'm not seeing any obvious better improvement from the currently unacceptable current version. Pinging MatthewVanitas. SwisterTwister talk 01:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not enough significant coverage to pass BIO or GNG, delete.—UY Scuti ^Talk 12:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above, and in addition, fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:PROF. The quantity of patents awarded does not match the quality. Bearian (talk) 16:12, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.