Edit this box |
I was looking through the GAN page and noticed this article was still stub-class. Per Wikipedia:Good article criteria#What cannot be a good article?, stubs cannot be GAs. I think it's a jerk move for reviewers to quick fail articles where a lot of work has been put it just because the article's a stub. I recommend that you get the article reclassed, so that it can make the cut. It looks like you've put a lot of good work into that page. Hope the reclassifying process goes well! Hog Farm (talk) 02:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bonanza City, New Mexico you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 04:40, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
The article Bonanza City, New Mexico you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bonanza City, New Mexico for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 05:01, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
The article Bonanza City, New Mexico you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bonanza City, New Mexico for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 04:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
On 9 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bonanza City, New Mexico, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bonanza City, New Mexico, was founded in 1880 and largely abandoned by 1890? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bonanza City, New Mexico. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of monuments and memorials removed during the George Floyd protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of monuments and memorials removed during the George Floyd protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yupik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Since you, afaict, are the WP:SHEPHERD of SCP, I'm commenting here.
I did this edit [1] because IMO, WP pop-cult stuff should have a decent secondary source, existing is not enough (and it was a little WP:PUFFERY). Then I searched for www.scp-wiki.net on WP and got a few hits. I removed a few, but in crappy articles like Per aspera ad astra and True name SCP isn't any worse than much else of the content. I may look into improving Per aspera ad astra at some point.
So, nothing you've done or should do, but perhaps a little interesting. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:03, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
…but for the mean time, I'll stay IP. Again, thanks!
125.167.115.222 (talk) 05:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
(Note: This is my incognito address, NOT MY PERSONAL IP. IT WILL HOP TO ANOTHER ADRESS)
The Original Barnstar | ||
In recognition for not only raising SCP Foundation up to GA status, but also keeping abreast of and promptly responding to developments relating to the subject. - Novov T C 03:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC) |
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
For documenting Wikipedia's (lack of) October hijinks. ((u|Sdkb)) talk 21:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC) |
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2021! I hope you have a good rest of the year. Nrco0e (talk · contribs) 00:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC) |
For improving the SCP Foundation related articles, I have seen them in the past, they're still great, but became greater when knowledgeable users, such as you, come in. I really want to give you a barnstar, but I have seen that other users have awarded the occasion. And now with the 6000 contest ending, I would wish that the article be expanded and enhanced. Cheers - Mark 125.167.112.177 (talk) 04:59, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
I suggested last year that as a joke we should replace the mainpage with a message stating "Due to recurring disruption on April 1, Wikipedia has decided to close the site for today. The encyclopedia will be available again tomorrow." Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Smile dog and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 4 § Smile dog until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 05:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
The Case of Charles Dexter Ward BBC Adaptation Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)