- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jeffrey Ingram[edit]
- Jeffrey Ingram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP1E Jprg1966 (talk) 02:57, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GedUK 13:36, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - BLP1E is usually applied to cases where the person is well-known for a single event and in this case we're talking more about a series of events. That said, the series of events is really all about the same thing. These sorts of stories are often followed up by local news outlets as a "where are they now" or "remember this guy we told you about last year". But that isn't really the same as being notable for something else - it's still the same event. I don't think there's any enduring notability here. Stalwart111 08:24, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 04:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Subject is not notable as per WP:BIO. N4 (talk) 02:38, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agree with Stalwart111's logic. Finnegas (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.