The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I am disregarding the Keep !votes as they appear to be socking and are in any event unpersuasive. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeffrey Sussman[edit]

Jeffrey Sussman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - The textbook definition of a vanity page. The account that created it edited only this page, then was dormant for 4 years and created/edited one other page. No activity since. No reliable sources - the NY Times citation is literally a "letter to the editor" written by Sussman himself. There is a claim to a "Who's Who" entry but the source is the promotional page for one of his non-notable books. Coverage in reliable secondary sources that I found consists of a couple mentions in the East Hampton Star, 27east.com, and one in New York Newsday. I don't think that rises to the level required. Amsgearing (talk) 16:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:12, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:12, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:12, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I wouldn't call the Publisher's Weekly blurb a "review" - it's more like a quick two-paragraph summary. If that's all there is, that's far short of meeting the requirements set in WP:AUTHOR. Amsgearing (talk) 20:30, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A picture with Ronald Reagan is not an indicator of notability. Amsgearing (talk) 20:29, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: the three "Keep" votes all apparently come from the same person. One IP, then a brand-new account voting 7 minutes later, then the same IP again. Amsgearing (talk) 18:46, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.