The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This had previously been closed as no consensus. However as was pointed out to me, one of the two keeps appears to be invoking presumptive notability for secondary schools and I am discounting it. That leaves a fairly clear consensus to delete. I am reclosing this discussion to reflect that. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jennings International School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL, lacks any independent secondary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 13:44, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 13:53, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 13:53, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 13:53, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 13:53, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is a primary school. This type of institution needs significant coverage to show notability which is lacking here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This is a secondary school, and I added references to the article -- not indepth, but enough to confirm that the school exists and that it offers courses in German. I am not sure whether the official name is Jennings International School or Jennings International College. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as it fails WP:NSCHOOL. There is no more presumed notability for secondary schools as it was discussed on RfC, so it is bound by significant coverage in reliable secondary sources and that is not present here. The references in the article are: primary, a listing, passing mention, passing mention, with my search consisting of listings of the school. It exists, but that is not enough. Even the Keep voter himself admits there isn't indepth coverage. Enough said. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:49, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - it passes WP:NSCHOOL now that the extra sources are added. The Goethe Institute and The Sunday Times are both third party. I should also add that international schools are not that common.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 17:45, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I do not see these sources as supporting the school's notability as in my opinion none of them display all the criteria needed. They are either not significant or not independent. The most promising source is probably the Goethe Institute, but the is not enough information to determine if that entry an independent assessment, or simply repeating information from the school's website. Even if reliable, it is only 1 source. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 06:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.