The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Darlin[edit]

Jessica Darlin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unremarkable adult actress; significant RS coverage cannot be found. The subject does not meet PORNBIO as the awards are scene-related or fan-based.

The article was discussed at AfD in 2007 with the decision to keep, based on 200+ films and AVN award nominations. PORNBIO has been tightened since then and I believe this article can be revisited. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:06, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:06, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:07, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:BLP as an article that cites no reliable sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:43, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Please cite specific BLP problems.  Unscintillating (talk) 23:58, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• The problem is, as I said perfectly clearly, that the article cites no reliable sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 06:31, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• What is "perfectly clear" is that you have not cited any specific BLP problems.  Unscintillating (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -as fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 01:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The defeat of the AFD back in 2007 is one of many decisions in 2007 that were unwise and that have given Wikipedia a very poor reputation as to how it treats women, generally as objects of male gaze valued for their ability to attack such as opposed to as human beings. It was called a "bad faith" nomination even though people supporting deletion rightly pointed out a lack of reliable sources. It is high time that pornographic actress bios be held to standard GNG rules, and this one comes no where near meeting such rules, and should be deleted with all deliberate speed.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No genuinely qualifying awards or substantive RS coverage. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 13:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.