The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jessie McKay[edit]

Jessie McKay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Clearly not notable. Has done nothing in SHIMMER and the rest is utterly non notable. Badly fails WP:N. Third of five nominations that may violate WP:COI !! Justa Punk !! 02:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Clearly IS notable. Grow up and get a life. Fool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JMck89 (talk • contribs) 03:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Nikki♥311 04:49, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Violates WP:COI. Not notable. Above "Keep" vote is suspect as well - see the user name - JMck89. Mal Case (talk) 06:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Way too early to tell. Can be recreated later. Mad Dog Dunstan (talk) 03:42, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete only one 3rd party source on her and that's Online World of Wrestling, which is not enough to prove Notability. The remaining sources confirms that she exists and that she wrestles, which is not enough to warrant a wikipedia page, you need proper Verifiability as well. MPJ-DK (talk) 17:20, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per MPJ-DK's comment. TaintedZebra (talk) 10:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete All five of these noms are not just WP:COI candidates, they violate WP:VAIN as well. Rick Doodle (talk) 04:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.