The result was keep. The subject meets WP:ATHLETE. The question the nominator is asking is "should we make an exception in this case?". After all, he only played in one game. Consensus (at least in this debate) appears to be that we shouldn't. There's a discussion concerning changing WP:ATHLETE here. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:55, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Baseball player who only played in one professional game and does not appear to be notable. Declined prod because this one game technically makes him meet WP:ATHLETE. But we must remember that WP:ATHLETE is just a guideline, nothing more, and we also need to use our heads and exercise some judgment—there are cases such as this where someone might fit the specific criteria set aside in the notability guideline but there is no intuitive reason to consider the person notable. In other words, I am asking if this article should be an exception to the usual guideline. I would like to hear more input from the community about this particular article, rather than just repeating the criteria from WP:ATHLETE. Thanks. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 16:00, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please comment on which item(s) the article does not meet. --dashiellx (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]