The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Kurykh (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John Lefebvre[edit]

John Lefebvre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. WP:BLP of a musician and entrepreneur, with no strong evidence of notability and no strong reliable sourcing -- except for a single news article from a wire service, this is otherwise parked entirely on primary sources like the subject's own blog, his own Twitter and his staff profile on the website of an organization he was on the board of. This is not the type of sourcing that it takes to make someone notable -- there's enough content here to deem him notable if he could be properly sourced over WP:GNG for it, but there's exactly nothing here that entitles him to an automatic inclusion freebie just because he exists. Bearcat (talk) 17:17, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:23, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I believe he was convicted for illegal gambling and possibly money laundering, not fraud. Neteller was significant pre-conviction - Lefebvre. The conviction itself was super significant - both for the size of the forfeiture and for online circumvention of US gambling laws. And post-conviction he has continued to do some "noise" (music, advocacy, whatever) which generated some attention - he didn't fade back into normalcy.Icewhiz (talk) 06:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.