The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 21:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Molesky[edit]

John Molesky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I thought this was genuine at first, but subsequent edits by the author suggest this is a hoax (see talk). Googling "john molesky mayor" gets nothing relevant. Closedmouth (talk) 04:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete either a hoax or extremely NN by the RS requirements. The author has also made a series of extremely dubious edits to other pages (I have tagged the talk page for speedy deletion as an attack page). The article also does not make sense as it claims he is the mayor of one hamlet and then a police officer in a different hamlet. Icewedge (talk) 07:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or snowball delete after a reasonable time if no serious objections are raised. "East Meadow" "John Molesky" returns no useful web or news results. Nothing on the chamber of commerce website which does list other office-holders. WODUP 07:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Hoax. Schuym1 (talk) 09:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - hoax or NN - either way, delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't delete it, it is not a hoax, John really won the position, the East Meadow Herald has not been published since the win and that is more than likely will cover the victory, and I think they have a website, so you will have your confirmation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hankhillftw (talk • contribs) 13:12, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nothing about it in the Nassau County election results. WODUP 22:08, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Considering that East Meadow is just a hamlet, they really aren't even eligible to elect a mayor. Obvious hoax and NN. BackInBlack (talk) 18:17, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I have tagged it as db-vandalism. Schuym1 (talk) 18:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • And it was declined because it's at AFD. Schuym1 (talk) 18:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.