The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 20:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Pennachetti[edit]

Joseph Pennachetti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Joseph Pennachetti does not appear to meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability. The article has been flagged for notability and secondary sources for 3 years, and no secondary sources have been added.

Completing incomplete nom by Jellicle (talk · contribs). — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete City managers are not generally notable, and Mr. Pennachetti does not appear to be an exception. There are mentions in news articles, but not significant coverage, just "City Manager Pennachetti said..." --MelanieN (talk) 03:26, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. the key here is that just being City Manager is not itself enough for notability. Put another way, would Mr. Pennachetti be notable if he were not City Manager? Or would the City Manager of Toronto be notable if it were not Mr. Pennachetti? I'll throw out the usual caveats as well, though - if there's some notable initiative or programme for which Mr. Pennachetti is responsible, then you might have a better case for notability. But we do not appear to be there just yet. No objection to a mention at Toronto, perhaps in the infobox if it goes there. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 15:35, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.