- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:15, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Joseph Shen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable person. PROD declined. Power~enwiki (talk) 04:14, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Joseph Shen(沈永刚) is a famous mediaer in China,much authoritative famous media,such as China Daily、Tencent News、Netease News,has reported him.User:Leonardo8964 (talk)
- Delete Subject fails WP:NOTE guidelines due to the fact that notability is not inherited and the sources currently cited do not (to my knowledge, I used a translator) mention Shen extensively.--SamHolt6 (talk) 05:57, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per notability. I looked at the references and can't see the subject being famous. The sources provided are either interviews or the subject's opinions or introduction, nothing really notable. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉← 06:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Reserve Joseph Shen(沈永刚) or Shen Yonggang is notable in some way.I looked at the references and see the subject being famous. The new sources provided are authoritative news report. -★- ReykjavikMax. →Message me. 🖉← (UTC) (Striking !vote by blocked sock.)
- Comment Note these two accounts have only ever contributed to this Afd and are likely SPAs.--SamHolt6 (talk) 21:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- User:VissarionovichMutk (talk) has now retracted his comment.--SamHolt6 (talk) 21:36, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Be advised that ReykjavikMax is mimicking my signature and user has been indef'ed. Will their votes still count? -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉← 01:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Since this isn't about votes it doesn't matter, it's about strength of argument and convincing the community of a particular course of action. Canterbury Tail talk 18:42, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.