The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If someone still wants to improve the article ask me or any other administrator for userfication.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jubilee USA Network[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A purely promotional article, here since 2006, with 3/4 of the content copied from their website. . I have not been able to find any sufficiently RSs, though they may exist. Even if they do, this would need to be started over.

I see the related articles in the see alsos here: Jubilee 2000 and Jubilee Debt Coalition. Neither of them seems better sourced, and they seem equally promotional. DGG ( talk ) 02:04, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and re-write. Organization clearly passes WP:GNG, with coverage in Bay Area Indy Media, Inter Press Service, and the Daily Californian. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:55, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:16, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:12, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the reasons that DGG gives. If the person who above suggests "Keep and re-write" had done a moderate amount of rewriting, I might think otherwise; but as this person hasn't made even token edits, I'm unconvinced. -- Hoary (talk) 04:41, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.