The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I have little faith in this editor and their rationales for deletion. Drmies (talk) 00:39, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kaepernick Publishing[edit]

Kaepernick Publishing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Patriot0239 (talk) 06:12, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Patriot0239 (talk) 06:12, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Meets GNG. I've added a few sources and made other minor improvements. ezlev^tlk
  _ctrbs 20:45, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:CORP and the variety of sources that were in the article and have been added; per WP:CORPDEPTH, multiple independent and reliable sources provide an overview, description, commentary, [...] discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization and it appears to be a level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements. Per WP:AUD, the sources include national/regional news outlets such as CNN, the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, and CBS News. Beccaynr (talk) 23:55, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.