The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kali (2016)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Shooting didn't start yet and source is also empty. Kitcher45 (talk) 07:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alts:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

producer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

and: WP:INDAFD: "Prem" "Kali film" "CR Manohar" "Shivarajkumar" "Sudeep"

Delete per being TOO SOON. The source link noted by Kitcher45 was easy enough to fix, but the thing only just had its title launch. As topic sources are available, we can allow a return as soon as we confirm filming. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 11:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per MQS - Way toosoon at the moment, Can easily be WP:UNDELETED in 2016. –Davey2010^Talk 16:18, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.