The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable cult leader. Only one secondary source. Previously deleted in an AfD for same reasons. Protect against re-creation. NeonMerlin18:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. protecting over 1 recreation 3.5 years after a previous AfD would be quite excessive even in the least notable case. --ThaddeusB (talk) 05:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What Thaddeus found is enough to justify a keep. I encourage him to edit the article the way it needs to be done. DGG (talk) 04:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've just been editing Santhigiri and have stumbled across enough sources for Karunakara Guru to show notability for both, and an obvious hat tip to ThaddeusB too. No doubt both pages need a lot of work, but that isn't a reason to delete, especially in obvious cases like these. -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes05:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.