The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per Horologium, and for lack of WP:RS for WP:V. Leuko 21:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm wondering if I can go ((db-nocontext)). Only tells that it is something that is a combination of three words. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in agreement with Horologium. Acalamari 01:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails to meet the standards for neologisms at WP:NEO. (For the avoidance of doubt, I just declined db-nocontext speedy deletion; there is enough context to identify the subject of the article.) GRBerry 20:10, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.