The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 03:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Katharine Moon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:Bio pretty hard. No third party coverage of this person; and the only decent google hits are from the education facilities who employ her. The Undead Never Die (talk) 01:42, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -A search for "Katherine H.S. Moon" with Google , Google Books and Google Scholar reveals this author and academic has several pages of published books and articles, as well as secondary sources that include references, citations and reviews. ABF99 (talk) 03:23, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As the holder of a named professorship at Wellesley and another one at Brookings she passes WP:PROF#C5 twice over. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:14, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think enough sources have been found to meet notability requirements. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.