The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KauCom[edit]

procedural nomination—version brought to AFD: This went through a PROD-dePROD cycle in February 2006 and was PROD-nominated again in January 2008 (diff between PROD-nominated versions). The recent PROD-nominator stated "A good faith effort to find references has failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources in order to comply with notability requirements. The search for references has included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from clicking these links: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability." User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:52, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Internet has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Could find no reliable sources Shoessss | Chat 14:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources to verify article. STORMTRACKER 94 15:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the article itself states that the software was not much used. No reliable sources given, and none could be found to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.