The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 02:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keenaz Hakeem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still confirm my PROD as it's clear this is only existing for advertising and thus policy WP:NOT applies and it's clear the one account is only here for advertising this ine subject. SwisterTwister talk 18:51, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per NOM as WP:PROMO. -- Dane ^talk 01:08, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete. A clear case for speedy deletion. Fails WP:NOTPROMOTION...Rameshnta909 (talk) 18:07, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.