The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Insufficient substantial, independent coverage to demonstrate notability. ~ mazca ^talk 16:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keith McDuffee[edit]

Keith McDuffee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable blogger per WP:NOTE/WP:BIO. I can't find any non-trivial coverage. Has been tagged as needing independent reliable sources for about 5 weeks but none have been forthcoming and I can't find any non-trivial treatment of him. Drawn Some (talk) 03:19, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable career. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Lots of hits, but mostly authored by the subject or trivial mentions. ReverendWayne (talk) 18:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.