This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep -- Francs2000 | Talk 13:03, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable by herself. Should be merged with Rosie O'Donnell.Mandel 16:32, July 23, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep The two of them together and as individuals are notable because of the case and its importance in California and the U.S. -Harmil 16:37, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • There're some 3000 couples who got married then. So what makes Kelli Carpenter more "notable" than the others save for the fact that she's married to O'Donnell? If she's only noted for that alone, doesn't it prove that she isn't notable? It also means that this 'stub' will be a stub forever. Mandel 16:55, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. If the nominator's opinion is that the article should be merged with Rosie O'Donnell, then he can do so without a VfD discussion. The original article could then be turned into a redirect. Easy and far less time consuming than VfD. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 18:35, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Um...so redirects can do without VfD? Mandel 06:01, July 24, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Mike H (Talking is hot) 20:48, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to Rosie O'Donnell. Yes, this should never have seen VfD, but now that it has, let's deal with it. -- Norvy (talk) 17:12, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Please note, someone MOVED this article during the VfD. The new name is Kelli Carpenter-O'Donnell.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.