- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Khatija[edit]
- Khatija (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This fictional character has only one film appearance. Does not meet WP:GNG as it lacks independent coverage in reliable sources including enough real-world/out-of-universe perspective. In addition, the page itself is written like a fancruft. Ab207 (talk) 06:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Film, and India. Ab207 (talk) 06:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Provides enough notability towards character. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.192.165.207 (talk) 06:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fancruft indeed. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) as most of this is original research. Read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Information that cannot be supported by reliable sources should not be included. Info on Khatija vs Kanmani fan war can be added on Kaathuvaakula Rendu Kaadhal main page. DareshMohan (talk) 07:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: This article does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). It also reeks of WP:COI. -Ranjith207 (talk) 12:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: the coverage does seem like WP:COI, and at the very least, is not independent. There are only WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs of this subject, which are not enough to provide WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Alternatively there may be value to merging this somewhere, if someone wants to suggest a valid target. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Checkuser note This article was created by a sock of User:Srinesh.saravanan who is banned.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:35, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Pure WP:FANCRUFT. At best, some of this could be merged into the film article, but most of it is something decent for a fandom site, but not Wikipedia. Ravensfire (talk) 18:55, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.