The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted at author request, and glad he thought better of it. FWIW, another user with Huggle restored his blanking as vandalism, but I assumed that was a mistake, not a statement it should be kept.. DGG (talk) 04:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of Laighin[edit]

Possible hoax or at least made up at school one day. Only 5 Ghits, none reliable. McWomble (talk) 13:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC) I am also nominating the following article for the same reason:[reply]

The Kingdom of Laighin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

McWomble (talk) 15:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete The article was clearly written as a joke by three kids at a middle school. Looks like they missed the opportunity to say something funny about a council whose members are Ronan, Rory and Ross. Go back to working on reading, 'riting and 'rithmetic. Mandsford (talk) 14:13, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as hoax.--Boffob (talk) 14:22, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete joke article made up at school by a bunch if kids looking to add to Wikipedia. RedThunder 14:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a "very unoffical (sic) micronation" sounds very WP:MADEUP. Vaguely amusing non-encyclopedic hoax. ~ mazca ^t|c 14:34, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. Also recommend bundling The Kingdom of Laighin into this. Edward321 (talk) 14:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. McWomble (talk) 15:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both as joke/hoax per all above, but congratulate the kids on their flag design, which looks good. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete both (G3) — Complete and utter bollocks. There is no such kingdom. I am inclined to agree in regards with WP:NFT. MuZemike (talk) 19:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note — tagging article for speedy deletion under G7 as the author is requesting deletion by blanking the page. MuZemike (talk) 03:42, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.