The result was no consensus. A discussion about a future Merge can occur on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 06:22, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:GNG with no significant coverage as pointed out on the talk page in 2011; from my research that has not changed in 13 years. Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:14, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More discussion regarding the various proposals and analysis of sourcing would be helpful in attaining a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Game Rules | Appears to be from the publisher of game | Explanation of rules | ✘ No | |
Is That a Word? | The source contains just two sentences about Kings Cribbage about why it's not notable: "The game is not to be confused with the still extant Kings Cribbage (put out by Conoco, not Hasbro) which is basically Cribbage played on a Scrabble board. It's not terribly easy to pick up, and seems destined to remain forever abandoned and gathering dust in the great toy attic of history." | ✘ No | ||
"Kings Cribbage players beat 'best in the UK'" | ? I cannot find this source. | ? | ? | ? Unknown |
SaskToday | Full game review | ✔ Yes | ||
Burnaby NewsLeader | Consists of quotation from the game's creator about the game and how many copies have been sold. No independent analysis of the game. | Brief mention. | ✘ No | |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using ((source assess table)). |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. It would be helpful to hear some comment about the source analysis.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:35, 1 March 2024 (UTC)