The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:09, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kings of the Underground: The Dramatic Journey of UGK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created via a paid-editing project on elance.com. The subject is nonnotable, as it hasn't received significant coverage in reliable, third party sources, or any major reviews or a wide theatrical release.

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letter to the President, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloody Island (documentary), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiss & Tail: The Hollywood Jumpoff, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Gibson (film director) for other articles created from this bid. ThemFromSpace 15:24, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep if notability can be established. The motivation of the article's creation should not be a reason to delete, if WP is an "encyclopedia anyone can edit."Kitfoxxe (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Notability has not yet been established as the film hasn't been covered in-depth by reliable sources. ThemFromSpace 19:32, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - quick search reveals no significant coverage by reliable sources that would make this documentary pass WP:NFILM.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 02:39, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:TOOSOON. The film was released on DVD just last August and is not making many waves. I just gave the article a sandblasting, but after diligent searches, I could not find enough to satisfy me that this one meets WP:NF. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.