The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sole keep argument carries no weight without sources. A Train^talk 15:42, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kirk of the Hills

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability Rathfelder (talk) 22:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:46, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:46, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:46, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- This looks like a rather typical local church. I had to check that it was not associated with the influential Kenneth E. Hagin, whose church and college, surprisingly, are not in the category for Tulsa churches. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- This is a poor quality article, but on a very notable church. The organization is notable both for its large size, and for its very public change in denominations. This kicked off a prolonged legal battle that set a precedent for many other churches. T-rex 13:40, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@T-rex: - thanks for your comment. I see you created the article ten years ago. If it's notable, are there some citations you can add? Blythwood (talk) 10:36, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article as it stands is just advertising, which could be improved. However, I can't find any substantial coverage apart from a small amount of local news about child abuse and theological disputes at the church. — Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 21:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.