The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy-deleted as copyvio. In the DRV discussion about the speedy-deletion, there was confirmation that even this new version was still a copyvio. The contributor has asserted that he can get copyright release. The page has been speedy-deleted pending confirmation of the release.

Note: This closure does not address the notability concern raised in the nomination below. If copyright release is confirmed and the page restored, this page may still require investigation and discussion. Rossami (talk) 23:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Knowledge instinct (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Deleted once as copyvio, this version is not a copyvio but the term appears to beb in strictly limited use. Of the small number of google hits and google scholar hits for the quoted term, most are accidental matches (e.g. knowledge, instinct) and the balance all seem to be traceable to Perlovsky. Perhaps a merge or redirect if the term can be proven to be significantly linked with Perlovsky? Guy (Help!) 20:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.