The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. the consensus seems to be that this fails [[WP:BAND] and WP:N NW (Talk) 19:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kooma (demogroup) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find any sources to back up the content in this article or prove notability; as written fails WP:BAND and the general notability guideline. Martin Raybourne (talk) 19:56, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.  B.Rossow ^talk_contr 20:05, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 20:46, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 20:46, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:04, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Undecided. Is winning 2nd place at Assembly (demo party) an indicator of notability? JBsupreme (talk) 07:26, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not according to WP:BAND Martin Raybourne (talk) 20:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is not a band, this is a demoscene group. Do we have a better test for notability for these? If we were to use the band analogy, I would think that placing second at Assembly would be the equivalent of being a headliner at Lollapalooza or something along those lines, in which case it actually would meet WP:BAND. Again, I'm still undecided but trying to think out loud. JBsupreme (talk) 05:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:N because the article has no references to reliable sources with substantial coverage of this group.  Sandstein  11:17, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.