The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 23:38, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kristina Guerrero

[edit]

Subject, as a local news personality, has not achieved sufficient notability or notoriety to merit inclusion on Wikipedia. Burghboy80 16:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non notable per WP:BIO. Can't find anything in Google News and Google doesn't provide anything either to show notability. Jayden54 20:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This person has done some noteworthy programs and shows. Examples include Acess Hollyood and Great Day San Antonio. --Scapone 22:07, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep funny I type her name into google and get all kinds of hits for TV she has done. IMDB has a listing for her as well.--Xiahou 03:52, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I made some edits to this article a while back, I realized then that she was not notable enough merit an article. In addition, information on Kristina is very scarce making it almost impossible to write a quality article on her. --Dx316dd 00:52, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Quarl ^(talk) 06:20, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Few noteworthy ghits, no indication of any real notability, very weak under WP:BIO criteria, extremely weak IMDB entry. Agent 86 07:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Doesn't appear to be worthy of a Wikipedia article...at least not right now. --Matth e wUND^(talk) 09:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete even if the claims could be documented, I don't see the notability from the write-up. --Kevin Murray 20:40, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails noteability and does not appear to be worthy of mention in Wikipedia. Davidpdx 11:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.