- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 02:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Kumar Nitesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly sourced BLP. Does not meet GNG or NBIO. // Timothy :: talk 01:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Badminton, and Haryana. AllyD (talk) 10:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep I don't understand nominator's rationale. Nitesh is a multiple para world championship medalist, easily meeting WP:GNG. He has a strong coverage in Hindi articles as well. Search "कुमार नितेश". Article needs to be tagged for improvement in place of having afd discussion. zoglophie 15:17, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you link some of these SIGCOV sources please? JoelleJay (talk) 21:53, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't found SIGCOV in any of those, except for some match coverage. However even Olympics covered him in a bwf sanctioned international tournament. A source ([1]) in the current version certainly has a lot of information about the athlete in detail. Besides, a ranking of 2, 3 in two different categories is more than being just notable, ofcourse. zoglophie 05:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep World Championships medalist in a Paralympic sport. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: It would be useful to include a statement regarding Nitesh's multiple para world championship medals in the article Almeida Fernando (talk) 05:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.