- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 17:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Kumud (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:V, GNG, GEOLAND. The tribal name is Kunud (Singular Kindi) but it's a tribal name, not a settlement or recognised area or region. And even then, this is spelled incorrectly and full of unsourced information general to the whole East Coast of the UAE. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:41, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:48, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:48, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 09:59, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 23:29, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- We already have an article at Kunud. If this is just an error for that, then delete. SpinningSpark 20:59, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete based on everything else this guy has created.Natureium (talk) 20:37, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:V. This is totally unsourced, except for a vague assertion that it's in a book, with no details. More disturbing is the assertion that this might be just a typo (or, more probably, alternate transliteration) of Kunud. Looking at the two articles, I have no way to prove or disprove the assertion. For an encyclopedia which holds WP:V above all else, that's a serious problem. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.