The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was 'Soft redirect' to Wiktionary.. — Coren ^(talk) 03:18, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kvetch[edit]

This is a dictionary definition attempting to masquerade as a disambiguation page; it fails in this because it doesn't link to any ambiguous articles. I don't see what could be written about kvetching beyond the dictionary definition which Wiktionary already has an entry on. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 06:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Soft Redirect to Wiktionary Brilliantine (talk) 06:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. —Tavix (talk) 21:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 19:46, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Soft redirect to Wiktionary. Dicdef. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Soft redirect to Wiktionary as it is currently a dicdef. Pie is good ^{(Apple is the best)} 21:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Transfer to Wiktionary per WP:NOTDICDEF. Is a great dictionary entry, but no terms are linked to any relevant Wikipedia articles that directly tie to that meaning. Many disambig pages double as dicdefs, which is frowned upon but accepted. But this is not even a page that lists Wikipedia articles that one would be looking for in relation to the word "kvetch." Sebwite (talk) 21:57, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a article at wiktionary that is better than this, so I don't believe there is any content that it would be beneficial to transfer. Brilliantine (talk) 03:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.